The Impact of Families Upon The Watchmens Rorschach and...

The manner in which an individual is raised can impact their lives forever. This idea is proven to be true with two characters from the works that were studied this semester. Although they come from completely different worlds, the similarities between these two characters and the manner in which they face the world can be associated with the relationships they had with their families. These two characters are Walter â€Å"Rorschach† Kovacs, from Alan Moores graphic novel which is called Watchmen, and Antoinette, from Jean Rhys novel which is called Wide Sargasso Sea. First, there is the character of Rorschach. Rorschach is a very angry character, who has a lot of psychological baggage that influences the way that he views the world around†¦show more content†¦In the case of Rorschach, he did not have a stable father figure in his life at all. Rather, Rorschach was raised by his mother before being subjected to foster care. This is made clear to the readers on page ei ght of chapter six in the pages first panel, when the character Dr. Micheal Long writes, â€Å"...he was removed from his mothers custody and put into care.† (Watchmen) However, he was still negatively effected by the few men that are seen in his early life. It is revealed on page thirty of chapter six that his mother, Sylvia Kovacs, is a prostitute, and that there was never a stable father figure for Rorschach to connect with. Rather, at least once, he saw a strange man engaged in a sexual act with his mother. He walks in on his mother and this man on page three of chapter six, worried that his mother is being harmed as he hears strange noises, which is shown on the second panel of the page. This already traumatic fact is made much more difficult because Rorschach is taunted by other people due to his mothers occupation and or reputation. It is illustrated that Rorschach is taunted and physically bullied by others on page six of chapter six, when two teenagers refuse to let him past them, refer to him as â€Å"whoreson† and shove food into his face. It can be argued that Rorschach might not have been subjected to this treatment if he had a stable father figure or a more stable home environment.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Womens Suffrage Leader

Elizabeth Cady Stanton (November 12, 1815–October 26, 1902) was a leader, writer, and activist in the 19th-century womens suffrage movement. Stanton often worked with Susan B. Anthony as the theorist and writer, while Anthony was the public spokesperson. Fast Facts: Elizabeth Cady Stanton Known For: Stanton was a leader in the womens suffrage movement and theorist and writer who worked closely with Susan B. Anthony.Also Known As: E.C. StantonBorn: November 12, 1815 in Johnstown, New YorkParents: Margaret Livingston Cady and Daniel CadyDied: October 26, 1902 in New York, New YorkEducation: At home, the Johnstown Academy, and the Troy Female SeminaryPublished Works and Speeches:  Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments (co-drafted and amended), Solitude of Self, The Womens Bible (co-written), History of Womens Suffrage (co-written), Eighty Years and MoreAwards and Honors: Inducted into National Womens Hall of Fame (1973)Spouse: Henry Brewster StantonChildren: Daniel Cady Stanton, Henry Brewster Stanton, Jr., Gerrit Smith Stanton, Theodore Weld Stanton, Margaret Livingston Stanton, Harriet Eaton Stanton, and Robert Livingston StantonNotable Quote: We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal. Early Life and Education Stanton was born in New York in 1815.  Her mother was Margaret Livingston and descended from Dutch, Scottish, and Canadian ancestors, including people who fought in the American Revolution. Her father was Daniel Cady, a descendant of early Irish and English colonists.  Daniel Cady was an attorney and judge. He served in the state assembly and in Congress. Elizabeth was among the younger siblings in the family, with one older brother and two older sisters living at the time of her birth (a sister and brother had died before her birth).  Two sisters and a brother followed. The only son of the family to survive to adulthood, Eleazar Cady, died at age 20. Her father was devastated by the loss of all his male heirs, and when young Elizabeth tried to console him, he said, I wish you were a boy.  This, she later said, motivated her to study and try to become the equal of any man. She was also influenced by her fathers attitude toward female clients.  As an attorney, he advised abused women to stay in their relationships because of legal barriers to divorce and to the control of property or wages after a divorce. Young Elizabeth studied at home and at the Johnstown Academy, and then was among the first generation of women to gain a higher education at the Troy Female Seminary, founded by Emma Willard. She experienced a religious conversion at school, influenced by the religious fervor of her time. But the experience left her fearful for her eternal salvation, and she had what was then called a nervous collapse. She later credited this with her lifelong distaste for most religions. Radicalization and Marriage Elizabeth may have been named for her mothers sister, Elizabeth Livingston Smith, who was the mother of Gerrit Smith.  Daniel and Margaret Cady were conservative Presbyterians, while cousin Gerrit Smith was a religious skeptic and abolitionist.  Young Elizabeth Cady stayed with the Smith family for some months in 1839, and it was there that she met Henry Brewster Stanton, known as an abolitionist speaker. Her father opposed their marriage because Stanton supported himself completely through the uncertain income of a traveling orator, working without pay for the American Anti-Slavery Society.  Even with her fathers opposition, Elizabeth Cady married abolitionist Henry Brewster Stanton in 1840.  By that time, shed already observed enough about the legal relationships between men and women to insist that the word obey be dropped from the ceremony. After the wedding, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and her new husband departed for a trans-Atlantic voyage to England to attend the Worlds Anti-Slavery Convention in London. Both were appointed delegates of the American Anti-Slavery Society.  The convention denied official standing to women delegates, including Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. When the Stantons returned home, Henry began to study law with his father-in-law.  Their family quickly grew.  Daniel Cady Stanton, Henry Brewster Stanton, and Gerrit Smith Stanton were already born by 1848; Elizabeth was the chief caregiver of them, and her husband was frequently absent with his reform work.  The Stantons moved to Seneca Falls, New York, in 1847. Womens Rights Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott met again in 1848 and began planning for a womens rights convention to be held in Seneca Falls. That convention, including the Declaration of Sentiments written by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and approved there, is credited with initiating the long struggle toward woman suffrage and womens rights. Stanton began writing frequently for womens rights, including advocating for womens property rights after marriage. After 1851, Stanton worked in close partnership with Susan B. Anthony. Stanton often served as the writer, since she needed to be home with her children, and Anthony was the strategist and public speaker in this effective working relationship. More children followed in the Stanton marriage, despite Anthonys eventual complaints that having these children was taking Stanton away from the important work of womens rights.  In 1851, Theodore Weld Stanton was born, then Margaret Livingston Stanton and Harriet Eaton Stanton. Robert Livingston Stanton, the youngest, was born in 1859. Stanton and Anthony continued to lobby in New York for womens rights, up until the Civil War. They won major reforms in 1860, including the right after divorce for a woman to have custody of her children and economic rights for married women and widows.  They were beginning to work for reform on New Yorks divorce laws when the Civil war began. Civil War Years and Beyond From 1862 to 1869, the Stantons lived in New York City and Brooklyn. During the Civil War, womens rights activity was largely stopped while the women who had been active in the movement worked in various ways first to support the war and then work for anti-slavery legislation after the war.   Elizabeth Cady Stanton  ran for Congress in 1866 in a bid to represent New Yorks 8th Congressional district. Women, including Stanton, were still not eligible to vote.  Stanton received 24 votes out of about 22,000 cast. Split Movement Stanton and Anthony proposed at the Anti-Slavery Society annual meeting in 1866 to form an organization that would focus on equality for women and African-Americans.  The American Equal Rights Association was the result, but it split apart in 1868 when some supported the 14th Amendment, which would establish rights for black males but would also add the word male to the Constitution for the first time, while others, including Stanton and Anthony, were determined to focus on female suffrage. Those who supported their stance founded the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) and Stanton served as president. The rival American Woman Suffrage Association (AWSA) was founded by others, dividing the womens suffrage movement and its strategic vision for decades. During these years, Stanton, Anthony, and Matilda Joslyn Gage organized efforts from 1876 to 1884 to lobby Congress to pass a national woman suffrage amendment to the constitution.  Stanton also lectured for the traveling public programs known as the lyceum circuit from 1869 to 1880.  After 1880, she lived with her children, sometimes abroad. She continued to write prolifically, including her work with Anthony and Gage from 1876 through 1882 on the first two volumes of the History of Woman Suffrage. They published the third volume in 1886. In these years, Stanton cared for her aging husband until his death in 1887. Merger When the NWSA and the AWSA finally merged in 1890, Elizabeth Cady Stanton served as the president of the resulting National American Woman Suffrage Association.  She was critical of the direction of the movement despite serving as president, as it sought southern support by aligning with those who opposed any federal interference in state limits on voting rights justified more and more the womens right to vote by asserting womens superiority.  She spoke before Congress in 1892, on The Solitude of Self. She published her autobiography Eighty Years and More in 1895. She became more critical of religion, publishing with others in 1898 a controversial critique of womens treatment by religion, The Womans Bible. Controversy, especially over that publication, alienated many in the suffrage movement from Stanton, as the more conservative majority of suffrage activists were concerned that such skeptical free thought ideas might lose precious support for suffrage. Death Elizabeth Cady Stanton spent her last years in ill health, increasingly hampered in her movements. She was unable to see by 1899 and died in New York on October 26, 1902, nearly 20 years before the United States granted women the right to vote. Legacy While Elizabeth Cady Stanton is best known for her long contribution to the woman suffrage struggle, she was also active and effective in winning property rights for married women, equal guardianship of children, and liberalized divorce laws. These reforms made it possible for women to leave marriages that were abusive of the wife or the children. Sources â€Å"Elizabeth Cady Stanton.†Ã‚  National Womens History Museum.Ginzberg, Lori D. Elizabeth Cady Stanton: An American Life. Hill and Wang, 2010.

The Causes and Effects of Whaling Free Essays

The Causes and Effects of Whaling 1 The Causes and Effects of Whaling Whale is the current name for diverse marine mammals of the order Cetacea, having the general shape of a fish with forelimbs modified as fins, a tail with level flukes, and one or two blowholes on top of the head. (â€Å"Whale†, 2010). Whaling dates back to prehistoric times, but it became an important industry in the nineteenth century. We will write a custom essay sample on The Causes and Effects of Whaling or any similar topic only for you Order Now Whales have been hunted for meat or made into lighting oil. Until the international injunction on commercially hunting whales was enacted in 1982 by International Whaling Commission (effective from 1986), some species were seriously endangered. Although commercial whaling was forbidden, several countries were unwilling to follow it such as Norway and Japan. They developed whaling industry for the sake of economic benefits and because the cost is low with free marine resources. But whaling has serious effects on both the environment as well as the society. Japanese are the leading whale hunters at present, now we use Japan as a typical example and we will mainly talk about Japan’s whaling. Commercial whaling is lucrative, the prosperous fishing industry in Japan also affects the economic interests of other industries such as tourism and Catering Industry. This is the first reason why Japan insists on whaling. According to a statistics of Japan’s Institute of Cetacean Research in 2000, the production of whale meat in Japan is 2849 tons, and the whale skin is 1051 tons. The revenue generated by whaling activities is more than US$32 million each year. Whaling What’s more, Japan has natural and vast amount of marine resources. The 2 whaling industry was also driven by the free marine resources. Japan was facing the pressure from public opinion especially the West about hunting whales unrestrictedly and excessively. But why Japan was still persisting in whaling? The most significant reason comes to my mind is cultural conflict. Put it this way, Japanese hate the way Europe and the United States imposes their values to them. They feel unfair and have no intention of lying down under those accusations, and they want to show their cultural identity through whaling. That is their subconscious action and they would like to take this way against â€Å"cultural imperialism† in order to safeguard their own interests. However, due to their continuous whaling, more than 2 million whales were killed in the early 20th century. Some species of whales are close to extinction. Whaling sounds nothing to do with us, how does whaling affect us? Japanese whaling in the northern Pacific Ocean has caused international objections, according to Reuben (2001), the potential full-scale trade war led by U. S. ill become true if Japan still refuses to reform Japan’s whaling practices. Another thing, the excessive whaling disturbs the balance of the ecosystem they belong to, it will also diminish the marine ecosystems, and even the whole could collapse. The worst influence is the people in Taiji, Japan were detected their mercury levels exceed standards which stipulated by World Health Organization because of eating whale meat in excess. It has Whaling co me to light that mercury is the most toxic element on earth. It is very dangerous for us to eat whale meat. 3 In conclusion, the excessive whaling caused by economic benefits and cultural conflict resulted in terrible impacts on oceanic environment and human beings. To save whales, Environmental protection organizations like Greenpeace or individuals are campaigning to end commercial whaling and the governments should also go to great lengths to end it. Whaling 4 References Whale. (October 8, 2009). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved April 17, 2010, from http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Whale Whaling. (February 12, 2009). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved April 17, 2010, from http://en. ikipedia. org/wiki/Whaling The Cove. April 25, 2009). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved April 17, 2010, from http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/The_Cove_(film) Reuben B. Ackerman. (2001, January) ‘Japanese Whaling in the Pacific Ocean: Defiance of International Whaling Norms in the name of ‘Scientific Research’, Culture, and Traditional’, Boston Colleg e, Retrieved April 17, 2010, from http://www. bc. edu/bc_org/avp/law/lwsch/journals/bciclr/25_2/07_TXT. htm Japan’s Institute of Cetacean Research, In Baidupedia, Retrieved April 17, 2010, from http://baike. baidu. com/view/1632862. html How to cite The Causes and Effects of Whaling, Essay examples

Commercial Law Law Reform Commission

Question: Describe about the Commercial Law for Law Reform Commission. Answer: Issue The issue here is whether Rebecca sues Michelle in negligence for her losses. Rules Negligence refers to the act done by a person in careless manner due to which physical, psychological or financial loss or injury is caused to another person or group of persons (Legal Services Commission, 2013). The suffered person might sue the person who caused such damage to compensate for the loss or injury incurred to him (Lawstuff, 2015). Civil Liability Act 1936 is applicable in South Australia, which is utilized in assessment of negligent act done by any person and the liability imposed on him for such an act. The sufferer seeks financial compensation for loss or damage(Legal Services Commission , 2013). In order to determine whether negligence has occurred or not, four demands must be satisfied i.e. if the defendant owes a duty of care or responsibility towards plaintiff, if that duty of care has been breached by the defendant, if any kind of injury or damage has been caused to the plaintiff, and finally, if the reason of injury or damage has been the consequence of breach of the duty of care and responsibility. To prove negligence on the part of defendant, all these factors are required to be satisfied and if even one of the above mentioned demands is not fulfilled, the establishment of negligence is impossible (Australian Law Reform Commission, 2016). To determine whether a person owes a duty of care towards other, the existence of a sufficient proximity of relationship is must. It is a legal obligation to prevent a person from causing harm to others and then also caused, when harm is rationally predictable and due care is not taken (RMIT University, 2004). The court determines the breach of duty of care by seeking at the standard of care to be predictable in the existing conditions. It is considered by the court that what course of action would have been done by a reasonable person in the similar situation and if the act done by the defendant has been found to be unreasonable from the standard predicted, he will be proved guilty of breach of due duty of care(Legal Aid , 2015). To determine the relation of breach of duty of care and injury, it is to be assessed if there are more than one causes of injury. Contributory negligence occurs in case where the cause of injury is found to have been the contribution of the injured person themselves(Trindade et al., 2007). Plaintiff will be considered as contributory negligent if he/she has failed to take due care for self-safety or loss incurred (International Law Office, 2001). Application Rebecca and Michelle were drunk when they left the opera after the performance. Even if Rebecca has realized the fact that Michelle was too drunk to drive, she did not refuse to sit in the car and not even suggested her not to drive the car in that condition. When they were on their way to home, knowing Michele was driving dangerously, she asked her twice to get out of the car but Michelle refused. As a consequence, Michelle continued the driving and crashed the car. Rebecca got seriously injured and her leg got broken. There is a clear Negligence on the part of Michelle. As Michelle drove the car in a careless manner as a consequence of which, Rebecca suffered from serious physical injuries. She got her leg broken. The assessment of negligent act done by Michelle can be proved under the Civil Liability Act of South Australia and Rebecca is eligible to sue Michelle for compensation for the loss or injury incurred to him. The four factors which are required to be satisfied to prove the negligence on the part of Michelle are as follows; Michelle and Rebecca are friends which show there is a sufficient relationship between the two to owe a duty of care towards each other. In this case, it was the legal obligation of Michelle and Rebecca to owe a duty of care towards each other. Neither Rebecca advised Michelle not to drive harshly even if she realized that she was very much drunk to drive the car, nor did Michelle though once not to drive as it might cause harm to both of them. Michelle and Rebecca are equally liable for the harm occurred as the harm was reasonably foreseeable and none of them took due care and responsibility. The breach of duty of care is clearly visible on the part of Michelle as, any reasonable person would not drive a car in a drunken state and put his/her life as well as others life in danger. However, duty of care has been breached on behalf of Rebecca also as, she should have stopped Michelle from driving the car in drunken condition. Contributory negligence shall be applicable on Rebecca as she was conscious enough not to accept the ride when Michelle was driving the car in a drunken state. She has failed to take due care for her own safety due to which she suffered serious injury. The fact is that Michelle and Rebecca are friends and equally owes duty of care towards each other, breached the duty of care, and the consequences are the serious injuries to Rebecca. The court would hold both of them equally liable for the incident. Conclusion Rebecca should not sue Michelle in negligence because she herself is equally responsible for the accident happened. Firstly, Michelle should not have driven car in drunken state and secondly, if she was ready to drive, it was the legal responsibility of Rebecca to stop her from driving the car. If then, she failed to do accordingly, she should have denied the ride to home with her for her own safety but she accepted the ride. The fault of Michelle is that she must have thought about the consequences of driving in a drunken state but she acted negligently and crashed the car and injured her friend too. Of course, her fault is bigger than the fault of Rebecca but the accident might have avoided by the reasonable act of Rebecca. Therefore, she is equally liable. Therefore, Rebecca should not sue Michelle for negligence. References Australian Law Reform Commission, 2016. 16. Authorising what would otherwise be a Tort. [Online] Available at: https://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/right-sue-tort [Accessed 9 September 2016]. International Law Office, 2001. Contributory Negligence no Longer a Winning Defence. [Online] Available at: https://www.internationallawoffice.com/Newsletters/Litigation/Australia/Clayton-Utz/Contributory-Negligence-no-Longer-a-Winning-Defence [Accessed 9 September 2016]. Lawstuff, 2015. Being Sued. [Online] Available at: https://www.lawstuff.org.au/sa_law/topics/being-sued [Accessed 9 September 2016]. Legal Aid , 2015. Negligence. [Online] Available at: https://www.legalaid.wa.gov.au/InformationAboutTheLaw/BirthLifeandDeath/Personalinjury/Pages/Negligence.aspx [Accessed 9 September 2016]. Legal Services Commission , 2013. Negligence. [Online] Available at: https://www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch01s05.php [Accessed September 2016]. Legal Services Commission, 2013. What is negligence? [Online] Available at: https://www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch29s05s01.php [Accessed 10 September 2016]. RMIT University, 2004. Explanation of negligence concept map. [Online] Available at: https://www.dlsweb.rmit.edu.au/lsu/content/d_bus/law/business_negligence/concept/explanation.html [Accessed 10 September 2016]. Trindade, F.A., Cane, P. Lunney, M., 2007. The Law of Torts in Australia. Oxford University Press.